annashirts.blogg.se

1. COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW SOFTWARE
2. COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW PLUS
3. COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW FREE
4. COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW MAC

That’s why I recommend home users also take a look at Bitdefender for Linux, which is 100% effective against all types of malware, fast, user-friendly, and very affordable. While I’m a fan of ClamAV, its biggest downside is that it’s somewhat difficult to use.In addition to having a powerful command-line antivirus scanner, it’s open-source, it’s got a massive virus directory that’s continuously updated, and it’s completely free.

COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW FREE

COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW SOFTWARE

When the risk of malware is almost non-existent with Linux, though, anti-malware software itself should be viewed with suspicion. This is also true on other platforms, but the risk of malware is that much greater on other operating systems that the need for antivirus software easily outweighs any such concerns. Antivirus software can actually be dangerous!Īntivirus programs can be hacked, a problem compounded by the fact that because of their very nature, they require many high-level permissions to do what they do. entering a password).īesides this, in most distros the open source Linux kernel is usually protected by a Mandatory Access Control (MAC) system such as AppArmor or SELinux, which limits what programs can do.Ĥ. It is very rare to login to Linux as a root user, meaning that malicious software cannot execute itself without your express permission (i.e. Most Linux software is installed via a distro's "app store”Īnd the chances of getting malware from software cataloged by your app store are virtually nil.

COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW MAC

Windows (88% market share) is the obvious low-hanging fruit, although Mac (9.3% market share) malware, while still rare, is becoming more common. It simply isn’t worth a techno-crook's time developing malware that targets its users. Linux has a desktop market share of around 1.8%. We discuss several reasons why you don't really need antivirus software below, but see our do I need antivirus for Linux guide for more information. Why don’t I need a Linux antivirus program?Īs mentioned previously, using antivirus software on a Linux machine isn't a necessity. While, for the sake of completeness, we have included a summary of the best antivirus options for Linux out there we do not feel they are needed (and it may even be counterproductive to run on your system).

COMODO ANTIVIRUS FOR LINUX REVIEW PLUS

You will probably need to read through the documentation to use ClamAV correctly, but it provides real-time system protection, plus on-demand and scheduled scans. Unfortunately, most of this information is outdated and we cannot find any modern tests on the effectiveness of ClamAV, so take this data with a pinch of salt.ĬlamAV can be downloaded using your distro's standard package manager (for example sudo apt-get clamav on most Debian distros), or can be downloaded as tarball from the ClamAV website for those who prefer to compile their programs from source.

Later in the same year, during a six-month test, ClamAV detected 75.45% of samples over the course, placing it fifth behind AhnLab, Avira, BitDefender and Avast. By 2011, Shadowserver discovered that ClamAV was able to detect 76.60% of malware when tested against 25 million samples, placing it 12 out of 19 of its rivals.

In the 2008 AV-Test, ClamAV was initially found to be largely ineffective with many false positives. There are no modern, up-to-date tests that verify how effective ClamAV is The first port of call for most Linux users who decide they really need an antivirus program in their life is the free, open source, command-line only ClamAV.